<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ATBNetworks &#187; 32nm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atbnet.us/tag/32nm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atbnet.us</link>
	<description>Technology and Science Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>AMD Re-Schedules Bulldozer Processors to 2011</title>
		<link>http://atbnet.us/2009/03/07/amd-re-schedules-bulldozer-processors-to-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://atbnet.us/2009/03/07/amd-re-schedules-bulldozer-processors-to-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 06:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[32nm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulldozer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atbnet.us/?p=641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is definitely not good news if you are an AMD fan or just someone hoping that AMD can stay competitive with Intel to keep prices down. According to the road-map, it looks like AMD will be riding the 45nm wave for their CPUs through 2010 until these chips featuring its new micro-architecture. This means [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atbnet.us/2009/03/07/amd-re-schedules-bulldozer-processors-to-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel demos 32nm processor</title>
		<link>http://atbnet.us/2009/02/11/intel-demos-32nm-processor/</link>
		<comments>http://atbnet.us/2009/02/11/intel-demos-32nm-processor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[32nm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westmere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atbnet.us/?p=611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just as AMD was catching up Intel went ahead and flexed its muscle and showed off a 32nm system. This comes on the same day as Intel announcing that it planning to invest $7 billion in processor fabs for the 32nm processors. The first chips that will be 32nm will be from codename Westmere. Where [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atbnet.us/2009/02/11/intel-demos-32nm-processor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel preps 32nm chips</title>
		<link>http://atbnet.us/2008/12/10/intel-preps-32nm-chips/</link>
		<comments>http://atbnet.us/2008/12/10/intel-preps-32nm-chips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[32nm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nahalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westmere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atbnet.us/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel is set to announce that it has completed development on its 32nm chip manufacturing process and it set to begin mass production for the chips release in late 2009. Intel&#8217;s plans aren&#8217;t final on the production of the Nahalem shrink Westmere chips because not much is known about the fabs that will produce them, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://atbnet.us/2008/12/10/intel-preps-32nm-chips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
